UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 


 

FORM 8-K

 


 

Current Report Pursuant

to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event Reported): October 28, 2014

 


 

THERAVANCE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 


 

Delaware

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation)

 

000-30319
(Commission File Number)

 

94-3265960
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

951 Gateway Boulevard
South San Francisco, California 94080
(650) 238-9600

(Addresses, including zip code, and telephone numbers, including area code, of principal executive offices)

 


 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

o            Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

o            Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 



 

Item 8.01 Other Events.

 

On October 28, 2014 at CHEST 2014 in Austin, Texas, GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) presented data from two Phase 3 studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the open triple therapy, the once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, added to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI), in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  FF/VI is a once-daily combination of a long-acting beta2 agonist (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroid.  FF/VI has been developed under the 2002 LABA collaboration between Glaxo Group Limited and Theravance, Inc.  The slide presentation is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

(d) Exhibits.

 

Exhibit

 

Description

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.1

 

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results of Two Replicate Randomized 12-Week Studies

 

2



 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

THERAVANCE, INC.

 

 

 

Date: October 28, 2014

By:

/s/ Michael W. Aguiar

 

 

Michael W. Aguiar

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

3



 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

99.1

 

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results of Two Replicate Randomized 12-Week Studies

 

4


Exhibit 99.1

 

GRAPHIC

Efficacy and safety of once-daily umeclidinium added to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of two replicate randomized 12-week studies Thomas M. Siler Midwest Chest Consultants, PC, 330 First Capitol Drive, Suite 470, St Charles, Missouri, USA

 


GRAPHIC

Disclosures Dr Siler has: Received research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Elevation, Forest Research Institute, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pearl Therapeutics and Sunovion Took part in Speaker bureau for: Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim and UCB Acted as a Consultant for: Astra Zeneca and Vapotherm The studies presented here were funded by GlaxoSmithKline (200109, NCT01957163; 200110, NCT02119286)

 


Off-label Discussion Declaration Thomas M. Siler I will be discussing data of the combination use of FF/VI and UMEC at doses of 62.5 mcg and 125 mcg. UMEC 125 mcg is not an approved dose.

 


GRAPHIC

COPD and unmet medical needs 1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disorder Report (2014) www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2014_Jan23.pdf COPD is characterized by persistent airflow limitation and contributes substantially to global morbidity and mortality1 Central to the pharmacological management of COPD are bronchodilators (e.g. LAMAs, LABAs) and inhaled anti-inflammatories (e.g. ICS)1

 


GRAPHIC

Study rationale Combination therapies can offer improvements in pulmonary function over monotherapies, with a lower risk of side effects compared with increasing the dose of a single agent1 These two replicate studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of UMEC added to FF/VI in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD 1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disorder Report (2014) www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2014_Jan23.pdf; 2. Glaxo Group Limited. RELVAR ELLIPTA® Summary of product characteristics. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs; 3. GlaxoSmithKline. INCRUSE® Summary of product characteristics. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/; 4. GlaxoSmithKline. INCRUSE® Prescribing Information. https://www.gsksource.com/gskprm/ Umeclidinium (UMEC, 62.5 mcg) is a LAMA indicated for long-term, once-daily maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in COPD3,4 Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI [combined ICS/LABA]) is indicated for long-term, once-daily maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in COPD2

 


GRAPHIC

Inclusion criteria Key inclusion criteria >40 years of age established diagnosis of COPD current or former cigarette smoker had a pre- and post-albuterol FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.7 and FEV1 <70% predicted prior ICS treatment allowed to Visit 1 no COPD exacerbation requirement* Patient numbers Study 1 (200109): a total of 727 patients were enrolled, 619 included in the ITT population and 93% completed the study Study 2 (200110): a total of 730 patients were enrolled, 619 included in the ITT population and 93% completed the study *patients enrolled did not need to have a history of COPD exacerbation in the 12 months prior to enrollment, and were required to withdraw if they experienced a COPD exacerbation during the run-in or study period that required additional treatment or hospitalization FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity

 


GRAPHIC

Study design Two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies Patients randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily treatment for 12 weeks (Double-blind for UMEC and placebo) Pre-screen Run-in FF/VI 100/25 mcg Once daily for 4 wks Open-label UMEC 125 mcg + FF/VI 100/25 mcg UMEC 62.5 mcg + FF/VI 100/25 mcg Placebo (PBO) + FF/VI 100/25 mcg Follow-up 1 week Visit 0 Visit 1 (Day -28) Visit 2 (Day 1) Visit 3 (Day 2) Visit 4 (Day 28) Visit 5 (Day 56) Visit 6 (Day 84) Visit 7 (Day 85)

 


GRAPHIC

Primary and secondary endpoints Primary endpoint Trough FEV1 at Day 85 Secondary endpoint Weighted mean FEV1 over 0–6 h obtained post-dose on Day 84 SGRQ, Saint George’s respiratory questionnaire Other key endpoints Serial FEV1, rescue use, SGRQ, safety (AEs, SAEs)

 


GRAPHIC

 Study 1 Study 2 PBO + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=207) PBO + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=207) Age, years 64.7 (7.90) 64.9 (8.72) 63.8 (7.65) 62.6 (9.00) 62.6 (8.12) 63.4 (7.49) Sex, male, n (%) 141 (68) 139 (67) 127 (61) 125 (61) 135 (66) 131 (63) Current smoker at screening, n (%) 90 (44) 81 (39) 87 (42) 119 (58) 120 (58) 116 (56) Smoking pack-years 50.6 (24.76) 50.1 (24.93) 47.9 (23.99) 46.2 (25.70) 46.8 (27.01) 45.6 (23.34) Baseline (pre-albuterol) FEV1­ (L) 1.156 (0.453) 1.117 (0.453) 1.158 (0.445) 1.287 (0.465) 1.240 (0.442) 1.271 (0.476) Post-albuterol FEV1/FVC 48.0 (10.83) 47.8 (10.20) 49.2 (10.34) 49.0 (10.18) 48.1 (10.31) 48.8 (10.39) % reversibility to albuterol 14.4 (14.36) 14.8 (11.97) 13.8 (11.62) 11.1 (12.75) 13.2 (12.88) 12.1 (11.25) Patients with one or more COPD exacerbations, n (%)* 42 (20) 44 (21) 40 (19) 42 (20) 30 (15) 45 (22) Baseline characteristics Values are reported as mean (standard deviation) unless otherwise stated. *within the 12 months prior to enrollment GSK, data on file.

 


GRAPHIC

Trough FEV1 (L) change from baseline Study 1 Study 2 Both doses of UMEC+FF/VI in both studies produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in trough FEV1 at Day 85 vs PBO + FF/VI (0.111–0.128 L, all p<0.001). 2 56 84 85 Day 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 -0.10 28 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 -0.05 -0.10 LS mean (95% CI) change from baseline 2 28 56 84 85 Day UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 Placebo + FF/VI 100/25 UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 GSK, data on file.

 


0–6 hour weighted mean FEV1 (L) GSK, data on file. Both doses of UMEC+FF/VI in both studies produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in 0-6 h post-dose WM FEV1 at Day 84 vs PBO + FF/VI (0.135–0.153 L, all p<0.001). Study 1 Study 2 UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 Placebo + FF/VI 100/25 UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 LS mean (95% CI) change from baseline 0.25 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 1 28 84 Day 0.20 1 84 Day 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 28

 


GRAPHIC

Serial FEV1 on Day 84 (L) GSK, data on file. Serial FEV1 showed a rapid onset of FEV1 improvements (statistically significant at the first measured timepoint of 15 minutes) with both doses of UMEC+FF/VI in both studies vs PBO+FF/VI, which was maintained through to Day 84 (all p<0.001). 0 23 24 1 Study 1 Study 2 Time (h) 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 -0.10 3 UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 Placebo + FF/VI 100/25 UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 -0.10 LS mean (95% CI) change from baseline 1 6 23 24 Time (h) 0 3 6

 


GRAPHIC

Symptomatic and HRQoL endpoints Rescue-albuterol use over Weeks 1–12 - Both doses of UMEC + FF/VI in both studies increased the percentage of rescue-free days vs baseline (range: 5.9–14.2%) compared with PBO + FF/VI (2.3% and 3.8%) - Significant improvements in mean rescue use in both UMEC + FF/VI groups vs PBO + FF/VI were observed in both studies (reduction of 0.2–0.4 puffs/day), with the exception of the UMEC 125 mcg + FF/VI group in Study 2 SGRQ on Day 84 - A significant 2.16-point improvement in SGRQ score was observed with UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI vs PBO + FF/VI in Study 2

 


Safety Study 1 Study 2 PBO + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=207) PBO + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 62.5 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=206) UMEC 125 + FF/VI 100/25 (N=207) Any on-treatment AE, n (%) 72 (35) 75 (36) 80 (39) 81 (39) 67 (33) 62 (30) Most common on-treatment AEs, n (%) Headache 6 (3) 9 (4) 9 (4) 5 (2) 8 (4) 4 (2) Nasopharyngitis 7 (3) 7 (3) 10 (5) 22 (11) 11 (5) 19 (9) Back pain 3 (1) 7 (3) 5 (2) 4 (2) 8 (4) 2 (<1) Any on-treatment SAEs, n (%) 6 (3) 2 (<1) 8 (4) 12 (6) 8 (4) 3 (1) Fatal AEs*, n (%) 1 (<1) 0 0 4 (2) 1 (<1) 0 COPD exacerbation 7 (3) 6 (3) 14 (7) 17 (8) 6 (3) 4 (2) AEs of special interest, n (%) Cardiovascular – any event Pneumonia and LRTI – any event 6 (3) 5 (2) 5 (2) 2 (<1) 3 (1) 4 (2) 6 (3) 1 (<1) 2 (<1) 2 (<1) 3 (1) 3 (1) *none of the fatal AEs were considered related to the study drug GSK, data on file.

 


GRAPHIC

Conclusions Once-daily UMEC (62.5 or 125 mcg) added to once-daily FF/VI resulted in improvements in lung function compared with PBO + FF/VI in patients with COPD. Safety profiles were consistent across all treatment groups.

 


GRAPHIC

Acknowledgments Any questions? Thank you to all the investigators involved in these studies