UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

 


 

FORM 8-K

 


 

Current Report Pursuant

to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event Reported):  November 13, 2013

 


 

THERAVANCE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 


 

Delaware

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation)

 

000-30319

(Commission File Number)

 

94-3265960

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

901 Gateway Boulevard
South San Francisco, California 94080
(650) 808-6000

(Addresses, including zip code, and telephone numbers, including area code, of principal executive offices)

 


 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

o            Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

o            Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 



 

Item 8.01 Other Events.

 

On November 13, 2013 at the 18th Congress of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology, Yokohama, Japan, GlaxoSmithKline plc (“GSK”) presented an oral presentation on a Phase 3 study of the once-daily treatment combination of fluticasone furoate “FF”, an inhaled corticosteroid, and vilanterol “VI”, a long-acting beta2 agonist, in Asian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).  In addition, GSK presented a poster on an ethnic sensitivity assessment of FF/VI in asthma patients in Japan and Korea.  In September 2013, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) approved FF/VI for the treatment of bronchial asthma (in cases where concurrent use of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting inhaled beta2 agonist is required).  FF/VI is not indicated for the treatment of COPD in Japan.  The MHLW has approved two doses of FF/VI - 100/25 mcg and 200/25 mcg.  Both strengths will be administered once-daily using the ELLIPTA™, a new dry powder inhaler.  RELVAR® ELLIPTA™ is the trade name in Japan.  FF/VI remains in development elsewhere in the world for the maintenance treatment of asthma and COPD, with pending marketing authorization applications in a number of countries.  FF/VI for the treatment of COPD is approved in the United States and Canada.  FF/VI is not indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm or the treatment of asthma in the United States or Canada.  FF/VI is not approved or licensed anywhere outside of the United States, Japan and Canada.  FF/VI is in development under the LABA collaboration agreement between Glaxo Group Limited and Theravance, Inc.  The slide presentation and poster are filed as Exhibit 99.1 and 99.2 to this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

(d)  Exhibits.

 

Exhibit

 

Description

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.1

 

The efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) in Asian patients with COPD

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.2

 

Ethnic sensitivity assessment of fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) in asthma patients in Japan and Korea: a pre-specified subgroup analysis

 

2



 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

THERAVANCE, INC.

 

 

Date: November 13, 2013

By:

/s/ Michael W. Aguiar

 

 

Michael W. Aguiar

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

3



 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

99.1

 

The efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) in Asian patients with COPD

 

 

 

99.2

 

Ethnic sensitivity assessment of fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) in asthma patients in Japan and Korea: a pre-specified subgroup analysis

 

4


Exhibit 99.1

 

GRAPHIC

The efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) in Asian patients with COPD Jinping Zheng1; Teresita de Guia2; Jie Wang-Jairaj3; Amy H Newlands3; Changzheng Wang4; Chin-chou Wang5; Courtney Crim6; Nanshan Zhong1 11st Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China 2Philippine Heart Center, Quezon City, Philippines 3GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK 4Xinqiao Hospital, Chongqing, China 5Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 6GlaxoSmithKline, North Carolina, USA

 


GRAPHIC

STATEMENT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE Jinping Zheng has the following statement of interest served as a consultant for a local advisory board, and received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda and Zambon ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Patients, investigators and staff at the 33 study centers in mainland China, Taiwan, the Philippines and South Korea Janet Flemming (data management); Eva Gomez and Farshid Hamayoun-Valiani (study management); Rehan Ali and QSI, Bangalore (data analysis and programming) Funded by GlaxoSmithKline (HZC113684; NCT01376245) Editorial support by Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, funded by GlaxoSmithKline

 


GRAPHIC

Background and objectives Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) combination Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist Once-daily combination treatment for COPD and asthma Delivered via the ELLIPTATM dry powder inhaler 100/25mcg approved in the USA and Canada for COPD Objectives To investigate efficacy and safety of three strengths of FF/VI in Asian COPD patients over 24 weeks 50/25mcg; 100/25mcg; 200/25mcg To evaluate suitability of FF/VI 100/25mcg as the therapeutic strength in Asian COPD patients ELLIPTATM is a trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies

 


GRAPHIC

Study design FF/VI 200/25mcg FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 50/25mcg PLACEBO Run-in –2 weeks Follow-up 1 week Study population Male or female Asian outpatients aged >40 years Clinical diagnosis of COPD (ATS/ERS1) Current or prior smoking history of >10 pack-years Post-salbutamol FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 Post-salbutamol FEV1 <70% of predicted Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale >2 24 weeks R 1Celli BR, MacMee W. Eur Respir J 2004;23:932–46 S F Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre

 


GRAPHIC

Endpoints Primary Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 24 Secondary Dyspnoea domain of CRQ-SAS 1,2 AT Week 24 Other Daily diary card measures (COPD symptoms, albuterol use) COPD Assessment Test TM (CAT) Safety Adverse events including exacerbation and pneumonia Clinical laboratory, vital signs and ECG Change from baseline in urinary cortisol excretion 1 Schunemann HJ. et al. Chest 2003; 124: 1421-9; 2 http://milo.mcmaster.ca/questionnaires/questionnaires CAT TM is a trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies

 


GRAPHIC

Baseline characteristics and demographics (ITT) FF/VI 50/25mcg (n=160) FF/VI 100/25mcg (n=161) FF/VI 200/25mcg (n=160) Placebo (n=162) Total (N=643) Age, yearsa 65.2 (8.41) 65.1 (9.19) 62.7 (8.65) 64.7 (8.78) 64.4 (8.80) Males, n (%) 144 (90) 149 (93) 145 (91) 146 (90) 584 (91) Mean mMRC scorea 2.2 (0.47) 2.2 (0.43) 2.3 (0.50) 2.3 (0.46) 2.2 (0.47) Post-bronchodilator FEV1 (L), n,a,b 155 1.16 (0.416) 161 1.22 (0.374) 159 1.21 (0.390) 161 1.18 (0.383) 636 1.20 (0.396) Post-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted, n,a,b 155 47.5 (14.21) 161 49.6 (13.19) 159 48.2 (13.63) 161 48.6 (13.39) 636 48.5 (13.60) Mean reversibility (%), n,a,b 154 14.1 (12.37) 160 12.8 (11.50) 159 15.2 (13.43) 161 12.8 (11.80) 634 13.7 (12.31) aMean (SD); bRecorded at Visit 1 (Screening)

 


GRAPHIC

FF/VI 50/25mcg FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 200/25mcg Day 169 LS mean change vs placebo (95% CI), L p-value 0.140 (0.089, 0.191) <0.001 0.179 (0.129, 0.230) <0.001 0.194 (0.143, 0.245) <0.001 LS=least squares; CI=confidence interval Day of study LS mean change (95% CI) from baseline in CRQ-SAS dyspnoea domain score 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg 28 FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 200/25mcg 56 84 168 Day of study LS mean change (95% CI) from baseline in trough FEV 1 (L) -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 200/25mcg 28 56 84 168 169 2 14

 


GRAPHIC

Secondary endpoint: CRQ-SAS dyspnoea domain at Week 24 FF/VI 50/25mcg FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 200/25mcg Day 168 LS mean change vs placebo (95% CI) p-value 0.21 (–0.01, 0.43) 0.064 0.34 (0.12, 0.56) 0.003 0.27 (0.05, 0.50) 0.016 LS=least squares; CI=confidence interval Day of study LS mean change (95% CI) from baseline in CRQ-SAS dyspnoea domain score 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg 28 FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 200/25mcg 56 84 168 Day of study LS mean change (95% CI) from baseline in trough FEV 1 (L) -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg FF/VI 100/25mcg FF/VI 200/25mcg 28 56 84 168 169 2 14

 


GRAPHIC

Daily diary card endpoints: COPD symptom score Dashed error bars indicate that statistical inference cannot be made -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Cough score Sputum score Breathlessness score FF/VI 50/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 100/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 200/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 100/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 200/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 100/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 200/25mcg vs placebo –0.08 (–0.18, 0.03) –0.14 (–0.25, –0.03) –0.09 (–0.20, 0.02) –0.01 (–0.13, 0.11) –0.05 (–0.17, 0.06) –0.05 (–0.17, 0.07) –0.19 (–0.31, –0.06) –0.23 (–0.35, –0.10) –0.17 (–0.30, –0.04) Favours placebo Favours FF/VI

 


GRAPHIC

Diary card endpoints: albuterol (rescue) use Dashed error bars indicate that statistical inference cannot be made -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Rescue-free 24h periods (%) Mean number of occasions rescue medication used per 24h period Mean number night-time awakenings requiring rescue-medication use FF/VI 50/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 100/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 200/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 100/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 200/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 50/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 100/25mcg vs placebo FF/VI 200/25mcg vs placebo 16.80 (10.34, 23.25) 15.72 (9.28, 22.15) 19.95 (13.50, 26.40) –0.38 (–0.56, –0.19) –0.36 (–0.54, –0.18) –0.48 (–0.66, –0.30) –0.14 (–0.22, –0.06) –0.12 (–0.20, –0.04) –0.12 (–0.21, –0.04) Favours placebo Favours FF/VI

 


GRAPHIC

Placebo (n=162) FF/VI 50/25 (n=160) FF/VI 100/25 (n=161) FF/VI 200/25 (n=160) Baseline n 161 159 161 160 Mean (SD) 14.0 (7.23) 15.1 (7.46) 14.2 (7.15) 14.2 (6.84) Day 168 n 129 136 138 134 Mean (SD) 13.5 (6.30) 13.1 (7.07) 11.6 (6.62) 12.1 (7.19) Change from baseline Mean (SD) –0.0 (7.93) –1.8 (7.88) –2.2 (6.65) –1.6 (7.82) Decrease (improvement in health status) in mean CAT score exceeds estimated minimal clinically important differences of 1.31 or 1.62 with all three strengths of FF/VI Largest decrease with FF/VI 100/25mcg 1Dodd JW. et al. Thorax 2011;66:425–9; 2Jones PW. et al. Eur Respir J 2009;34:648–54 COPD Assessment Test (CAT)

 


GRAPHIC

Adverse events (AEs) Placebo (n=162) FF/VI 50/25 (n=160) FF/VI 100/25 (n=161) FF/VI 200/25 (n=160) Any on-treatment AE 63 (39) 64 (40) 59 (37) 77 (48) Any serious AE 14 (9) 9 (6) 7 (4) 14 (9) Any fatal AE 2 (1) 1 (<1) 1 (<1) 1 (<1) Most frequent on-treatment AEsa Upper respiratory tract infection 15 (9) 16 (10) 19 (12) 14 (9) Nasopharyngitis 7 (4) 13 (8) 9 (6) 19 (12) COPD exacerbationb 7 (4) 3 (2) 3 (2) 8 (5) Pyrexia 5 (3) 3 (2) 4 (2) 3 (2) Cough 2 (1) 2 (1) 6 (4) 3 (2) Pneumonia 4 (2) 2 (1) 1 (<1) 5 (3) Hypertension 1 (<1) 1 (<1) 2 (1) 5 (3) Oropharyngeal pain 0 0 2 (1) 4 (3) ITT population; aFrequency >3% in any group; bReported as a serious AE

 


GRAPHIC

Safety: other No indication of treatment effect on glucose or potassium No clinically significant changes in vital signs versus placebo No changes of clinical concern for ECG parameters No indication of treatment effect on urinary cortisol excretion 24h urinary cortisol excretion ratio to baseline at Day 168 (urinary cortisol population) 100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 Placebo n=162 FF/VI 50/25 n=160 FF/VI 100/25 n=161 FF/VI 200/25 n=160 Ratio to Day 1 urinary cortisol excretion (nmol/24h)

 


GRAPHIC

Summary All three strengths of FF/VI improved trough FEV1 Improvements observed on CRQ-SAS Dyspnoea domain but not clinically important Improvements observed on diary card measures Treatment benefit perceived by patients was also demonstrated by CAT scores All three strengths of FF/VI displayed acceptable safety profiles consistent with historical data 1,2 1 Kerwin EM. et al. Respir Med 2013;107:560-9; 2 Martinez FJ. et al. Respair Med 2013; 107:550-9

 


GRAPHIC

FF/VI 100/25mcg is an appropriate therapeutic strength for the treatment of COPD in Asian patients based on the totality of data from this study. Conclusions

 

Exhibit 99.2

 

POSTER NO. PS272

 

Ethnic sensitivity assessment of fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) in asthma patients in Japan and Korea: a pre-specified subgroup analysis

 

Gross AS(1), Goldfrad C(2), Hozawa S(3), James M(4), Clifton CS(1), Sugiyama Y(5), Jacques L(6)

 


(1)Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline, Sydney, Australia; (2)Quantitative Sciences Division, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK; (3)Hiroshima Allergy and Respiratory Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan; (4)Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Tokyo, Japan; (5)Medicines Development Respiratory, GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Tokyo, Japan; (6)Respiratory Medicines Discovery and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK

 

INTRODUCTION

 

·                  Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) combinations are recommended by Japanese(1) and global asthma guidelines(2) for asthma patients uncontrolled on ICS alone.

 

·                  FF/VI is a once-daily ICS/LABA combination therapy delivered via the ELLIPTATM dry powder inhaler, which is effective for 24h.

 

·                  Responses to pharmacotherapy can vary across ethnic groups(3),(4) including in Japanese patients.

 

OBJECTIVES

 

·                  To establish whether doses of FF/VI recommended from multinational studies are relevant to asthma patients in Japan.

 

·                    To compare the efficacy, safety, PK and PD data for FF/VI in patients from Japan and/or Korea with data from patients not from Japan or Korea

 

·                  Patients from Korea were included due to similarities in a range of intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors between the populations of Japan and Korea.(5)–(7)

 

METHODS

 

·                  A pre-specified subgroup analysis of multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group international studies that included asthma patients from Japan and/or Korea.

 

·                  Inclusion criteria: >12 years of age, pre-bronchodilator % predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 40–90%, FEV1 reversibility of >12% and >200mL.

 

·           Efficacy results were pooled from three Phase III studies, ranging from 12 to 76 weeks duration, that included patients from Japan (GSK study numbers: HZA106827; HZA106829; HZA106837).

 

·           Change from baseline in trough FEV1 after 12 weeks with once-daily FF/VI 100/25mcg, once-daily FF 100mcg or placebo was analysed across two studies (HZA106827; HZA106837) and data for once-daily FF/VI 200/25mcg, once-daily FF 200mcg and twice-daily fluticasone propionate (FP) 500mcg were from one study (HZA106829).

 

·           Safety data were pooled from the three studies noted above and an additional three placebo-controlled Phase IIb studies, ranging from 28 days to 8 weeks duration, that included patients from Korea (B2C109575; FFA109685; FFA109687).

 

·           PK data were estimated based on a post-hoc analysis of population PK data for FF(8) and of study DB111207 data for VI(9); PD data, including 24h urinary cortisol excretion, were assessed.

 

RESULTS

 

Table 1. Demographic and baseline characteristics

 

Demographic and baseline characteristics (Efficacy population)

 

 

 

Japan

 

Not-Japan

 

Overall

 

 

 

N=148

 

N=3066

 

N=3214

 

Age(1) (years)

 

47.5 (14.66)

 

41.9 (16.63)

 

42.2 (16.59)

 

Male (%)

 

38

 

36

 

36

 

Weight(1) (kg)

 

62.5 (13.63)

 

76.2 (19.29)

 

75.5 (19.28)

 

Height(1) (cm)

 

160.7 (8.05)

 

165.7 (9.98)

 

165.5 (9.96)

 

FEV1(1) (L)

 

1.933(2) (0.5481)

 

2.231(3) (0.6469)

 

2.218(4) (0.6456)

 

% Predicted FEV1(1)

 

74.7(2) (11.13)

 

70.6(3) (11.18)

 

70.8(4) (11.21)

 

 

Demographic characteristics (Safety population)

 

 

 

 

 

Not-

 

 

 

 

 

Japan+Korea

 

Japan+Korea

 

Overall

 

 

 

N=194

 

N=4037

 

N=4231

 

Age(1) (years)

 

46.1 (15.00)

 

41.3 (16.47)

 

41.5 (16.44)

 

Male (%)

 

40

 

37

 

37

 

Weight(1) (kg)

 

63.5 (13.37)

 

76.1(5) (19.68)

 

75.5(6) (19.61)

 

Height(1) (cm)

 

161.6 (8.46)

 

165.7 (10.21)

 

165.5 (10.17)

 

 


(1)Mean (SD); (2)n=147; (3)n=3059; (4)n=3206; (5)n=4036; (6)n=4230

 

Efficacy

 

·                    Efficacy data were compared between patients (N=3214) from Japan and ‘Not-Japan’; 85% (N=2739) completed the studies.

 

·                    Improvements in trough FEV1 were reported in all populations for FF/VI 100/25mcg and FF 100mcg versus placebo and for FF/VI 100/25mcg versus FF 100mcg (Table 2)

 

·                  There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in treatment effect between patients from Japan and Not-Japan (p=0.403).

 

·                    Changes from baseline in FEV1 were similar with FF/VI 200/25mcg and FF 200mcg in patients from Japan and the overall population (Figure 1)

 

·                  Improvements were greater than with twice-daily FP 500mcg.

 



 

Table 2. Comparison of change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 12 between treatment arms (Efficacy population)

 

 

 

 

 

FF/VI

 

FF

 

 

 

 

 

100/25mcg

 

100mcg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N

 

1201

 

1203

 

 

 

 

 

0.181

 

0.105

 

 

 

Difference vs. placebo(1)

 

(0.111, 0.252)

 

(0.034, 0.175)

 

 

 

 

 

p<0.001

 

p=0.003

 

Overall

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0. 077

 

 

 

 

Difference vs. FF 100mcg

 

(0.045, 0.108)

 

 

 

 

 

 

p<0.001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

n

 

46

 

46

 

 

 

 

 

0.323

 

0.216

 

Japan

 

Difference vs. placebo(2)

 

(0.104, 0.542)

 

(–0.003, 0.436)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Difference vs. FF 100mcg

 

0.107

 

 

 

 

 

 

(–0.056, 0.270)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

n

 

1155

 

1157

 

Not-Japan

 

Difference vs. placebo(3)

 

0.168

 

0.093

 

 

 

 

 

(0.095, 0.241)

 

(0.020, 0.166)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Difference vs. FF 100mcg

 

0.075

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.043, 0.108)

 

 

 

 

Least squares mean change (95% confidence interval). Studies included: HZA106827, HZA106837. Data were analysed using a Last Observation Carried Forward Analysis of Covariance model, with terms for baseline FEV1, region, gender, age, treatment group, study & region by treatment interaction. 1n=193; 2n=18, 3n=175

 

Figure 1. Box plot of change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 12 by geographic region (Efficacy population)

 

 

Safety

 

·                    Safety data were compared between patients (N=4231) from Japan/Korea and Not-Japan/Korea; N=3584 (85%) completed the studies.

 

·                    In all active treatment groups, a greater proportion of patients from Japan/Korea versus Not-Japan/Korea reported on-treatment adverse events; this trend was also observed in the placebo group, suggesting that this is not related to FF or VI (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Summary of on-treatment adverse events and serious adverse events (Safety population)

 

 

 

 

 

FF/VI

 

FF/VI

 

FF

 

FF

 

 

Placebo

 

100/25mcg

 

200/25 mcg

 

100mcg

 

200mcg

All on-treatment adverse events

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japan+Korea

 

12/29 (41)

 

37/47 (79)(1)

 

9/14 (64)(1)

 

38/55 (69)

 

16/22 (73)

Not-Japan/Korea

 

87/375 (23)

 

658/1163 (57)

 

83/183 (45)

 

744/1375 (54)

 

134/386 (36)

Overall

 

99/404 (25)

 

695/1210 (57)

 

92/197 (47)

 

782/1430 (55)

 

150/390 (38)

On-treatment non-fatal serious adverse events

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japan+Korea

 

0/29 (0)

 

1/47 (2)(1)

 

0/14 (0)(1)

 

1/55 (2)

 

0/22 (0)

Overall

 

0/404 (0)

 

40/1210 (3)

 

6/197 (3)

 

30/1430 (2)

 

1/390 (<1)

On-treatment fatal adverse events

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japan+Korea

 

0/29 (0)

 

0/47 (0)(1)

 

0/14 (0)(1)

 

0/55 (0)

 

0/22 (0)

Overall

 

0/404 (0)

 

1/1210(2) (<1)

 

0/197 (0)

 

1/1430 (<1)

 

0/390 (0)

 

Data presented as number of patients with an adverse event/number of patients in population group (%);

 


(1)Only subjects from Japan;

(2)One additional subject (South East Asian) died during follow-up

 

Safety (cont’d)

 

·                    Serious adverse events reported for patients from Japan+Korea (1 FF/VI 100/25mcg, 1 FF 100mcg: both subarachnoid haemorrhage) were not considered drug related.

 

PK/PD

 

·                    Estimated FF AUC(0-24) and VI Cmax were higher in Japanese versus White/Caucasian patients (Table 4).

 



 

PK/PD (cont’d)

 

·                    No clinically relevant effects on cortisol concentrations (Figure 2) or heart rate were observed.

 

·                    The PK profile of FF at clinical doses (<200mcg) did not differ when administered simultaneously with VI 25mcg compared with FF alone for either Japanese or White/Caucasian patients.

 

Table 4. Model predicted PK parameters

 

Race

 

Treatment

 

N

 

C max (pg/mL)

 

AUC (0-24) (pg.h/mL)

Model predicted FF PK parameters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.0

 

348.6

 

 

FF/VI 100/25mcg

 

14

 

[11.8, 26.1]

 

[214.7, 510.8]

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.9

 

304.6

Japanese

 

FF 100mcg

 

15

 

[13.2, 27.8]

 

[240.4, 382.6]

 

 

 

 

 

 

42.4

 

605.1

 

 

FF/VI 200/25mcg

 

13

 

[28.2, 59.7]

 

[489.2, 871.8]

 

 

 

 

 

 

34.6

 

581.9

 

 

FF 200mcg

 

8

 

[24.2, 49.8]

 

[374.1, 855.1]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FF/VI 100/25mcg;

 

 

 

15.2

 

232.2

White /

 

FF 100mcg

 

492

 

[14.9, 15.6]

 

[226.0, 238.5]

Caucasian

 

FF/VI 200/25mcg;

 

 

 

30.0

 

471.6

 

 

FF 200mcg

 

471

 

[29.1, 30.8]

 

[459.0, 484.1]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Model predicted VI PK parameters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.3

 

139.1

 

 

FF/VI 100/25mcg

 

14

 

[38.7, 243.7]

 

[117.2, 159.0]

Japanese

 

 

 

 

 

144.9

 

146.1

 

 

FF/VI 200/25mcg

 

13

 

[63.4, 236.1]

 

[119.4, 168.0]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White /

 

FF/VI 100/25mcg;

 

 

 

42.2

 

165.7

Caucasian

 

FF/VI 200/25mcg

 

660

 

[39.7, 44.9]

 

[160.2, 171.4]

 

Geometric mean (95% confidence interval); FF data from post-hoc analysis of population PK data(8); VI data from post-hoc analysis of study DB111207(9)

 

Figure 2. Ratio of 24h urinary cortisol excretion to baseline at the end of treatment  (Urinary cortisol population(1))

 

 


(1)Urinary cortisol population: subset of patients from Safety population, that were not considered to have confounding factors, and for whom urine samples were available;

(2)Only subjects from Japan

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

·                    The efficacy and safety profile of FF/VI is similar in asthma patients from Japan+Korea and Not-Japan+Korea.

 

·                    The FF/VI clinical doses recommended based on global studies are also suitable for asthma patients in Japan.

 


REFERENCES

 

(1)         Ohta K, et al. Allergol Int. 2011;60:115–45.

(2)         Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Burden of Asthma. Available at: http://www.ginasthma.org/ local/uploads/files/GINABurdenReport_1.pdf. Last accessed: 10 Sept 2013.

(3)         Bjornsson TD, et al. J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:943–67.

(4)         Huang SM, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;84:287–94.

(5)         Jin HJ, et al. PLoS ONE 2009;4:1–10.

(6)        HUGO Pan-Asian SNP Consortium, et al. Science 2009;326:1541–45.

(7)         Chowbay B, et al. Drug Metab Rev 2005;37:327–78.

(8)         GSK data on file.

(9)         Nakahara N, et al. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013;51:660–72

 

ACKNOWLEDEGMENTS

 

·                    The presenting author, Yutaro Sugiyama, is employed by GlaxoSmithKline.

 

·                    The authors acknowledge the contributions of the following employees of GlaxoSmithKline: Dr Romina Nand, Dr Carol Lee and Dr Ann Allen.

 

·                    These studies were funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK study codes HZA106827 (cllinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT01165138); HZA106829 (NCT01134042); HZA106837 (NCT01086384); B2C109575 (NCT00600171); FFA109685 (NCT00603278); FFA109687 (NCT00603382); DB111207 (NCT00964249).

 

·                    Editorial support (in the form of writing assistance, assembling tables and figures, collating author comments, grammatical editing and referencing) was provided by Laura Maguire, MChem, at Gardiner-Caldwell Communications (Macclesfield, UK) and was funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

 

 

ELLIPTATM is a trade mark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies

 

Presented at the 18th Congress of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology, Yokohama, Japan, 11–14 November 2013